There is nothing funny about an exhibit at the NY public library showing photographs of President Bush and several prominent figures in his administration manipulated to simulate mug shots. (click here for NY Daily News article)

Libraries don't seem to be places in which artists should look to make political statements. For the curator to assert that this exhibit is a "relevant example" of political commentary merely raises a concern about the judgement of the curator.

While public libraries exist for many reasons, political commentary wouldn't seem to be one of their primary responsibilities. Most communities, especially those in the New York area, have museums and galleries ready and able to offer talented artists forums to display quality work.

This is most likely a central reason why the display ended up in the library- the quality of the works probably couldn't meet the standards required by either galleries or museums.

I am waiting to hear about the next exhibit showing real mug shots of liberals. I am guessing it will be awhile...